NARESH KUMAR versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
Consistent evidence established that the deceased was harassed for dowry by her husband soon before her death. Statutory presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act arises, and appellant failed to rebut it. Husband cannot claim parity with acquitted relatives due to his unique responsibilities. Conviction and sentence under Section 304-B IPC are upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant: Naresh Kumar; Respondents: State of Haryana & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence Affirmed by High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Dowry Death, Section 304 B IPC, Presumption Under Section 113 B Evidence Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naresh Kumar
Appellant
State of Haryana & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence Affirmed by High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consistent evidence establishes harassment for dowry soon before the death of the deceased
- 2 Whether acquittal of in-laws exonerates the husband
- 3 Sufficiency of suicide note for exoneration of accused
Ratio Decidendi
Consistent evidence established that the deceased was harassed for dowry by her husband soon before her death. Statutory presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act arises, and appellant failed to rebut it. Husband cannot claim parity with acquitted relatives due to his unique responsibilities. Conviction and sentence under Section 304-B IPC are upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence upheld.
Orders
- Appellant directed to surrender to undergo remaining sentence; failing which, he may be arrested and committed to custody.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment