NARINDER KUMAR MALIK versus SURINDER KUMAR MALIK
Since the respondent failed to pay the consideration within the time stipulated in the MOU, was not genuinely ready and willing to perform his part, and defaulted on the contract, the MOU cannot be given effect to and is unenforceable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Narinder Kumar Malik; Respondent: Surinder Kumar Malik
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final (supreme Court Decision on Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; judgment and decree of High Court set aside and quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Partition Suit, Memorandum of Understanding (mou), Enforceability of Contract, Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract, Specific Performance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Narinder Kumar Malik
Appellant
Surinder Kumar Malik
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final (supreme Court Decision on Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the parties is enforceable when payment obligations were not honoured within stipulated time.
- 2 Whether 'readiness and willingness' to perform under contract suffices without actual and genuine compliance of the obligations.
Ratio Decidendi
Since the respondent failed to pay the consideration within the time stipulated in the MOU, was not genuinely ready and willing to perform his part, and defaulted on the contract, the MOU cannot be given effect to and is unenforceable.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; judgment and decree of High Court set aside and quashed.
Orders
- MOU between parties cannot be enforced.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment