NATHU RAM versus STATE OF HARYANA

NATHU RAM versus STATE OF HARYANA

The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code are sustained as the prosecution evidence, though containing minor discrepancies, is credible and natural, with no established motive for false implication, and the circumstances established complicity and abetment in the attempted offence.

Parties
Appellant: Nathu Ram; Respondent: State of Haryana
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 October 1993
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court From Conviction and Sentence Affirmed by High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.
Legal Topics
Attempt to Commit Rape, Outraging the Modesty of a Woman, Abetment, Appreciation of Evidence, Delay in Filing FIR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nathu Ram

Appellant

State of Haryana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court From Conviction and Sentence Affirmed by High Court

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 376/511 IPC was justified on the evidence presented
  2. 2 Whether the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, despite minor discrepancies, could be relied upon to sustain the conviction
  3. 3 Whether the sentence awarded to the appellant was excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code are sustained as the prosecution evidence, though containing minor discrepancies, is credible and natural, with no established motive for false implication, and the circumstances established complicity and abetment in the attempted offence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence confirmed.