MIS NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. versus RAJ KISHORE @ SAHU JENA AND ANR.

MIS NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. versus RAJ KISHORE @ SAHU JENA AND ANR.

The appellant, as beneficiary, is entitled to be impleaded as a party in pending compensation proceedings, following the binding precedent set by the Supreme Court in UP. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: National Aluminium Co. Ltd.; Respondent: Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena; Respondent: Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 January 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Orissa High Court Order Dated 11.3.93 in C.r. No. 72 of 1992
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Compensation, Impleadment of Beneficiary
Land Acquisition Compensation Impleadment of Beneficiary

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Aluminium Co. Ltd.

Appellant

Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena

Respondent

Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Orissa High Court Order Dated 11.3.93 in C.r. No. 72 of 1992

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the beneficiary company is entitled to be impleaded as a party in pending land acquisition compensation proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, as beneficiary, is entitled to be impleaded as a party in pending compensation proceedings, following the binding precedent set by the Supreme Court in UP. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appellant to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.
  • No costs.