NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITYOF versus SAYEDABAD TEA COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.
Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of arbitrator is not maintainable where Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 specifically provides for appointment by the Central Government, and Act 1956 is a self-contained code excluding the operation of Section...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: National Highways Authority of India; Respondents: Sayedabad Tea Company Ltd. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court orders set aside
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbitrator Under Special Statute, Exclusion of General Arbitration Law, National Highways Act Mechanism
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Highways Authority of India
Appellant
Sayedabad Tea Company Ltd. and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable for appointment of an arbitrator when Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 provides for appointment by the Central Government
Ratio Decidendi
Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of arbitrator is not maintainable where Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 specifically provides for appointment by the Central Government, and Act 1956 is a self-contained code excluding the operation of Section 11 for this purpose.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court orders set aside
Orders
- Order passed by the High Court appointing an arbitrator invoking Section 11 of the 1996 Act is set aside.
- Central Government to appoint Arbitrator under Section 3G(5) of Act 1956 within 30 days with prior intimation to respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment