NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus CHOLLETI BHARATAMMA AND ORS.
The Supreme Court held that there is no statutory liability for the insurer to cover passengers (including gratuitous) in goods carriages under Section 147, either before or after its 1994 amendment, except for the owner of goods travelling in the cabin as per policy terms and statutory rules. The insurer's liability does not extend to other passengers unless expressly provided for and additional premium paid. Tribunal/High Court decisions allowing wider coverage were set aside where not supported by law or evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: National Insurance Co. Ltd.; Respondents: Cholleti Bharatamma and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgments/orders
- Outcome
- Appeals disposed of; some appeals allowed, others dismissed depending on facts and evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Liability Under Motor Vehicles Act, Coverage for Passengers in Goods Carriages, Interpretation of Insurance Policy Under S.147
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Appellant
Cholleti Bharatamma and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgments/orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the insurer liable to indemnify the owner for death/injury to passengers, including gratuitous passengers, in goods carriage vehicles under s.147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (before and after amendment)?
- 2 Does Section 147 include coverage for passengers travelling in goods carriages, and what constitutes 'owner of goods'?
- 3 Effect of amendments to Section 147 regarding insurance coverage for passengers in goods vehicles
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that there is no statutory liability for the insurer to cover passengers (including gratuitous) in goods carriages under Section 147, either before or after its 1994 amendment, except for the owner of goods travelling in the cabin as per policy terms and statutory rules. The insurer's liability does not extend to other passengers unless expressly provided for and additional premium paid. Tribunal/High Court decisions allowing wider coverage were set aside where not supported by law or evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeals disposed of; some appeals allowed, others dismissed depending on facts and evidence.
Orders
- Appeals in CA@SLP(C)Nos. 7237-39/2003 allowed; insurer not liable for gratuitous passengers.
- Appeal in CA@SLP(C)Nos. 7241-43/2003 dismissed; owner of goods definition clarified, not proved for deceased.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment