SUNEETA AGGARWAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

SUNEETA AGGARWAL versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Appellant disentitled herself to relief by applying afresh and appearing before selection committee without protest in response to re-advertisement and is estopped by her conduct from challenging the earlier order of the Vice Chancellor.

Parties
Appellant: Neeta Aggarwal; Respondents: State of Haryana and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 February 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab & Haryana High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Recruitment, Estoppel, Selection Process, Discretionary Relief
Service Law Recruitment Estoppel Selection Process Discretionary Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neeta Aggarwal

Appellant

State of Haryana and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab & Haryana High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether appellant could challenge the earlier order of Vice Chancellor declining approval to her selection after participating in subsequent selection process

Ratio Decidendi

Appellant disentitled herself to relief by applying afresh and appearing before selection committee without protest in response to re-advertisement and is estopped by her conduct from challenging the earlier order of the Vice Chancellor.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal fails and is dismissed
  • No order as to costs