NORTH EASTERN COALFIELDS COAL INDIA LTD. versus MUBARAK ALI AND ORS.
After nationalization, all rights, title, and interest of the erstwhile private mining company vested in Central Government. The declaration by Additional Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia, of land as 'Sarkari', was illegal and without jurisdiction as it ignored statutory provisions and the vested rights. The definition of 'mine' under Section 2(h) is wide enough, but the question whether entire leased area falls within the definition is a matter for inquiry, which must be conducted after due notice.
- Parties
- Appellant: North Eastern Coalfields Coal India Ltd.; Respondent: Mubarak Ali; Respondent: Corporate Law Group
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Gauhati High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Vesting of Property Under Nationalization, Legality of Government Declaration of Land as 'sarkari', Definition of 'mine' Under Coal Mines (nationalization) Act, 1973, Land Revenue and Lease Rights Post Nationalization
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Eastern Coalfields Coal India Ltd.
Appellant
Mubarak Ali
Respondent
Corporate Law Group
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Gauhati High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of Additional Deputy Commissioner declaring ARTC Ltd. as Fout Ferrar and land as 'Sarkari' was legal
- 2 Whether the leased area vested in Central Government falls within the definition of 'Mine' under Section 2(h) of Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973
Ratio Decidendi
After nationalization, all rights, title, and interest of the erstwhile private mining company vested in Central Government. The declaration by Additional Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia, of land as 'Sarkari', was illegal and without jurisdiction as it ignored statutory provisions and the vested rights. The definition of 'mine' under Section 2(h) is wide enough, but the question whether entire leased area falls within the definition is a matter for inquiry, which must be conducted after due notice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment and order dated 27th September, 2002 of the Division Bench of Gauhati High Court set aside.
- Order of learned Single Judge affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment