NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY & ORS. versus TRIPPLE ENGINEERING WORKS
Inordinate delay in arbitral proceedings and failure of the contractually agreed mechanism justified the High Court in deviating from contract terms and appointing an independent arbitrator to effectuate the remedy under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
- Parties
- Appellant: North Eastern Railway & Ors.; Respondent: Tripple Engineering Works
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Patna High Court in Request Case No.3 of 2012
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbitrator, Deviation From Contract Terms in Exceptional Circumstances, Section 11(6) Arbitration & Conciliation Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Eastern Railway & Ors.
Appellant
Tripple Engineering Works
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Patna High Court in Request Case No.3 of 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was right in appointing a retired Chief Justice as arbitrator, contrary to clause 64(3)(a)(ii) and (iii) of the General Conditions of Contract which required appointment of Railway Officers
Ratio Decidendi
Inordinate delay in arbitral proceedings and failure of the contractually agreed mechanism justified the High Court in deviating from contract terms and appointing an independent arbitrator to effectuate the remedy under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No interference with the High Court's order appointing a retired Chief Justice as arbitrator.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment