N.R. NARAYAN SWAMY versus B. FRANCIS JAGAN
Eviction petitions on bona fide requirement are maintainable as the cause is recurring, and Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) CPC and Section 45 of Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 do not bar institution of a fresh eviction petition if no issue has been decided finally in the earlier proceeding.
- Parties
- Appellant: N.R. Narayan Swamy; Respondent: B. Francis Jagan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Bona Fide Requirement, Maintainability of Fresh Eviction Petition, Application of Res Judicata, Application of Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) CPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N.R. Narayan Swamy
Appellant
B. Francis Jagan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a fresh eviction petition on the ground of bona fide requirement is maintainable after withdrawal of an earlier petition on the same ground without leave of the court.
- 2 Whether Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) CPC and Section 45 of Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 bar the second petition.
- 3 Whether bona fide requirement is a recurring cause.
Ratio Decidendi
Eviction petitions on bona fide requirement are maintainable as the cause is recurring, and Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) CPC and Section 45 of Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 do not bar institution of a fresh eviction petition if no issue has been decided finally in the earlier proceeding.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order dated 8.12.1999 of the High Court of Karnataka in HRRP No. 845 of 1999 is set aside.
- Order dated 24.7.1999 passed by the trial court is restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment