NTPC LIMITED versus ANSALDO CALDAIE BOILERS INDIA P. LTD. & ANR.

NTPC LIMITED versus ANSALDO CALDAIE BOILERS INDIA P. LTD. & ANR.

The tender condition required that the Qualified Steam Generator Manufacturer must manufacture the evaporator itself and not outsource its manufacture, as the evaporator is integral to the Steam Generator. Since the respondent proposed an evaporator manufactured by a third party, the technical bid did not conform to tender requirements, justifying the rejection of the bid.

Parties
Appellant: NTPC Limited; Respondent: Ansaldo Caldaie Boilers India P. Ltd.; Respondent: Another Respondent (name not specified)
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment in Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; impugned High Court judgment set aside; writ petition dismissed.
Legal Topics
Tender Conditions, Public Contracts, Minimum Technical Qualifications, Judicial Review of Tender Rejection
Contract Law Government Tenders Tender Conditions Public Contracts Minimum Technical Qualifications Judicial Review of Tender Rejection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NTPC Limited

Appellant

Ansaldo Caldaie Boilers India P. Ltd.

Respondent

Another Respondent (name not specified)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment in Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether in case of a joint venture undertaking, the Qualified Steam Generator Manufacturer had to be the manufacturer of the evaporator or could act as a facilitator
  2. 2 Whether the Steam Generator Manufacturer proposed by respondent no.1 was a Qualified Steam Generator Manufacturer under the tender definition

Ratio Decidendi

The tender condition required that the Qualified Steam Generator Manufacturer must manufacture the evaporator itself and not outsource its manufacture, as the evaporator is integral to the Steam Generator. Since the respondent proposed an evaporator manufactured by a third party, the technical bid did not conform to tender requirements, justifying the rejection of the bid.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; impugned High Court judgment set aside; writ petition dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court is set aside.
  • Writ Petition filed by respondent no.1 is dismissed.