NUTAN RANI AND ANR. versus GURMAIL SINGH AND ORS.
High Court erred in not adding for future prospects in deceased’s income; addition of 40% warranted as per Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680; deduction of one-third for personal expenses is proper; total compensation recomputed accordingly.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nutan Rani; Respondent: Gurmail Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 23.02.2011 in FAO No. 1949 of 1998 (o&m)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Motor Accident, Calculation of Income of Deceased, Future Prospects in Compensation, Deduction for Personal Expenditure, Multiplier Method
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nutan Rani
Appellant
Gurmail Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 23.02.2011 in FAO No. 1949 of 1998 (o&m)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in not adding amount for future prospects while computing income of the deceased.
- 2 Whether deduction of one-third for personal expenditure was proper.
Ratio Decidendi
High Court erred in not adding for future prospects in deceased’s income; addition of 40% warranted as per Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680; deduction of one-third for personal expenses is proper; total compensation recomputed accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Total compensation of Rs.6,41,200/- with interest at 9% per annum from date of petition until payment awarded to appellants.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment