ICICI BANK LIMITED versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF APS STAR INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS.
Assignment of debts/NPAs inter se between banks is permissible under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, in light of RBI Guidelines issued under Sections 21 and 35A, and the contracts of assignment are not illegal. The assignee bank is entitled to substitution in place of the original lender (assignor) in company liquidation proceedings.
- Parties
- Assignor: ICICI Bank Limited; Respondent: Official Liquidator of APS Star Industries Ltd.; Assignee: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Division Bench Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Debts by Banks, Non Performing Assets (npas), Company Liquidation Proceedings, Statutory Interpretation, Role of Reserve Bank of India (rbi)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ICICI Bank Limited
Assignor
Official Liquidator of APS Star Industries Ltd.
Respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Assignee
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Division Bench Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether assignment of debts by banks inter se is impermissible under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949
- 2 Whether executed contracts of assignment of debts are illegal
- 3 Whether assignee bank is entitled to substitution in place of original lender in company liquidation proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Assignment of debts/NPAs inter se between banks is permissible under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, in light of RBI Guidelines issued under Sections 21 and 35A, and the contracts of assignment are not illegal. The assignee bank is entitled to substitution in place of the original lender (assignor) in company liquidation proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment(s) on assignment of debts under Banking Regulation Act, 1949 set aside
- Matters remitted to Division Bench of High Court(s) for consideration of other issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment