OM PAL SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

OM PAL SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

Conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustained as evidence from eyewitnesses and dying declaration reliably established the appellant’s guilt; dying declaration, although not recorded with doctor’s certificate nor in question-answer form, was credible given the circumstances, and medical evidence corroborated the ocular testimonies.

Parties
Appellant: Om Pal Singh; Respondent: State of U.P.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 26.08.2002 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 604 of 1980
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.
Legal Topics
Murder, Evidence, Dying Declaration, Previous Enmity
Criminal Law Murder Evidence Dying Declaration Previous Enmity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Om Pal Singh

Appellant

State of U.P.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 26.08.2002 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 604 of 1980

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on evidence of eyewitnesses and dying declaration.
  2. 2 Reliability of dying declaration in the absence of doctor’s certificate and recording in non-question-answer form.

Ratio Decidendi

Conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustained as evidence from eyewitnesses and dying declaration reliably established the appellant’s guilt; dying declaration, although not recorded with doctor’s certificate nor in question-answer form, was credible given the circumstances, and medical evidence corroborated the ocular testimonies.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Orders

  • No reason to interfere with judgments of trial court and High Court.
  • Conviction of appellant under Section 302 IPC sustained.