OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA versus KANWAR BHAN AND OTHERS
Adverse remarks and directions against the appellant, who was not a party to the proceedings and whose conduct was not necessary to decide the lis, violated principles of natural justice and Article 21; such remarks must be expunged.
- Parties
- Appellant: OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA; Respondent: KANWAR BHAN
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment in LPA No. 1456 of 2009 Following Single Judge in CWP No. 12384 of 2008, Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Reputation Under Article 21, Natural Justice, Judicial Restraint, Expunction of Adverse Remarks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA
Appellant
KANWAR BHAN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment in LPA No. 1456 of 2009 Following Single Judge in CWP No. 12384 of 2008, Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adverse remarks against a person not party to a case should be expunged when not necessary for decision and without opportunity for explanation
- 2 Whether High Court’s directions concerning recovery of interest/costs from a non-party violate principles of natural justice
Ratio Decidendi
Adverse remarks and directions against the appellant, who was not a party to the proceedings and whose conduct was not necessary to decide the lis, violated principles of natural justice and Article 21; such remarks must be expunged.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Adverse remarks and directions affecting the appellant's reputation expunged.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment