OM PRAKASH versus STATE OF HARYANA

OM PRAKASH versus STATE OF HARYANA

The conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC was set aside because the prosecution failed to prove prior concert or common intention between the appellant and the perpetrator required by Explanation 1; however, the appellant's conviction under Section 368 IPC for wrongfully confining the prosecutrix was upheld and the sentence maintained.

Parties
Appellant: Om Prakash; Respondent: State of Haryana; Co Accused: Jai Prakash
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal to Supreme Court
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed
Legal Topics
Gang Rape, Common Intention, Section 376(2)(g) IPC, Section 368 IPC, Delay in Lodging FIR, Medical Evidence, Witness Contradictions, Joint Liability
Criminal Law Evidence Penal Code, 1860 Sexual Offences Gang Rape Common Intention Section 376(2)(g) IPC Section 368 IPC +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Om Prakash

Appellant

State of Haryana

Respondent

Jai Prakash

Co Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal to Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was liable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC for gang rape
  2. 2 Whether prosecution proved common intention/prior concert between the appellant and Jai Prakash
  3. 3 Effect of delay in lodging the FIR on the prosecution's case

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC was set aside because the prosecution failed to prove prior concert or common intention between the appellant and the perpetrator required by Explanation 1; however, the appellant's conviction under Section 368 IPC for wrongfully confining the prosecutrix was upheld and the sentence maintained.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed

Orders

  • Conviction of the appellant under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside and appellant acquitted of that charge
  • Conviction under Section 368 IPC maintained