ONKAR NATH MISHRA & ORS. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

ONKAR NATH MISHRA & ORS. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

No allegations of entrustment or misappropriation of property by appellants, nor harassment by in-laws to coerce unlawful demand except by husband; charges under Section 406 IPC against all appellants and Section 498A IPC against in-laws are not made out and are quashed; charge under Section 498A IPC against husband is upheld.

Parties
Appellant: Onkar Nath Mishra; Respondent Advocate: Pramod Swarup; Respondent Advocate: Saket Singh; Respondent Advocate: Nalin Tripathi; Respondent Advocate: Anurag Sharma
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
14 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order on Criminal Revision
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed
Legal Topics
Dowry Harassment, Cruelty to Wife, Criminal Breach of Trust, Framing of Charges
Criminal Law Dowry Harassment Cruelty to Wife Criminal Breach of Trust Framing of Charges

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Onkar Nath Mishra

Appellant

Pramod Swarup

Respondent Advocate

Saket Singh

Respondent Advocate

Nalin Tripathi

Respondent Advocate

Anurag Sharma

Respondent Advocate

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order on Criminal Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether allegations in complaint and charge-sheet justify framing charges under Sections 406 and 498A IPC against appellants
  2. 2 What are the legal standards for framing charges under the Code of Criminal Procedure

Ratio Decidendi

No allegations of entrustment or misappropriation of property by appellants, nor harassment by in-laws to coerce unlawful demand except by husband; charges under Section 406 IPC against all appellants and Section 498A IPC against in-laws are not made out and are quashed; charge under Section 498A IPC against husband is upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed

Orders

  • Charges under Section 406 IPC against all appellants quashed
  • Charges under Section 498A IPC against appellant Nos. 1 and 2 quashed