P. C. GULATI versus LAJYA RAM KAPUR AND OTHERS
The High Court is competent to transfer a case from the court of a Magistrate to the court of Sessions under s. 526(1)(ii) of the CrPC, and s. 193 does not bar further proceedings by the Sessions Court in a case so transferred.
- Parties
- Appellant: P. C. Gulati; Respondent: Lajya Ram Kapur; Respondent: Respondent No. 3
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Order of Punjab High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed (majority); dissent sets aside transfer order.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Cases, Jurisdiction of Sessions Court, Commitment Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. C. Gulati
Appellant
Lajya Ram Kapur
Respondent
Respondent No. 3
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Order of Punjab High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has power under s. 526(1)(ii) CrPC to transfer a criminal case from Magistrate to Sessions Court without commitment
- 2 Whether Sessions Court can take cognizance of such case without express provision or proper commitment
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court is competent to transfer a case from the court of a Magistrate to the court of Sessions under s. 526(1)(ii) of the CrPC, and s. 193 does not bar further proceedings by the Sessions Court in a case so transferred.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed (majority); dissent sets aside transfer order.
Orders
- Appeals dismissed as per majority judgment.
- Dissent: Direction to transfer case to another Magistrate; setting aside order of Punjab High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment