P. LAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Once the government accepts the notice for voluntary retirement, the retirement becomes effective and the master-servant relationship is severed; communication of acceptance is not required where the employee has abandoned service; withdrawal of voluntary retirement request is not valid after acceptance.
- Parties
- Appellant: P. Lal; Appellant Advocate: Ms. S. Janani; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.; Respondent Advocate: R.S. Suri; Respondent Advocate: Ajay Bansal, Dy. Adv. Genl., Punjab; Respondent Advocate: Jagjit Singh Chhabra; Respondent No. 3 Advocate: Ram Jethmalani; Respondent No. 3 Advocate: L. Nageswara Rao; Respondent No. 3 Advocate: Sushil Dutt Salwan; Respondent No. 3 Advocate: Mrs. Ruby Singh Ahuja
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeals allowed, impugned judgment set aside, tribunal's order restored
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Retirement, Withdrawal of Request, Master Servant Relationship, All India Services Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. Lal
Appellant
Ms. S. Janani
Appellant Advocate
Union of India and Ors.
Respondents
R.S. Suri
Respondent Advocate
Ajay Bansal, Dy. Adv. Genl., Punjab
Respondent Advocate
Jagjit Singh Chhabra
Respondent Advocate
Ram Jethmalani
Respondent No. 3 Advocate
L. Nageswara Rao
Respondent No. 3 Advocate
Sushil Dutt Salwan
Respondent No. 3 Advocate
Mrs. Ruby Singh Ahuja
Respondent No. 3 Advocate
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 When is withdrawal of voluntary retirement permissible?
- 2 Does acceptance of voluntary retirement require communication to the employee?
- 3 Does employee conduct amount to abandonment and severance of service relationship?
Ratio Decidendi
Once the government accepts the notice for voluntary retirement, the retirement becomes effective and the master-servant relationship is severed; communication of acceptance is not required where the employee has abandoned service; withdrawal of voluntary retirement request is not valid after acceptance.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed, impugned judgment set aside, tribunal's order restored
Orders
- Respondent No.3 has ceased to be in government service with effect from May 1993.
- No necessity for further termination order; official records to be corrected if they show continued service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment