P. R. YELUMALAI versus N.M. RAVI

P. R. YELUMALAI versus N.M. RAVI

Since decree-holder failed to deposit balance consideration within time and in the manner stipulated by the court, suit stood dismissed automatically; decree-holder cannot seek execution of a decree which does not exist in the eyes of law.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: P. R. Yelumalai; Respondent: N.M. Ravi
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition on Appeal From High Court Order of Remand
Outcome
Appeal by plaintiff dismissed; appeal by defendant allowed
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Execution of Decree, Extension of Time, Mode of Payment, Conditional Decree, Lis Pendens
Civil Law Property Law Specific Performance Execution of Decree Extension of Time Mode of Payment Conditional Decree Lis Pendens

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P. R. Yelumalai

Appellant

N.M. Ravi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition on Appeal From High Court Order of Remand

  1. 1 Whether delay of one day in depositing balance sale consideration beyond stipulated period can be condoned
  2. 2 Whether deposit by cash instead of demand draft defeats decree compliance
  3. 3 Whether acceptance of deposit by court is implied extension

Ratio Decidendi

Since decree-holder failed to deposit balance consideration within time and in the manner stipulated by the court, suit stood dismissed automatically; decree-holder cannot seek execution of a decree which does not exist in the eyes of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal by plaintiff dismissed; appeal by defendant allowed

Orders

  • Suit stood dismissed for non-compliance with conditional decree
  • Execution petition cannot be sustained as decree does not exist