P. R. YELUMALAI versus N.M. RAVI
Since decree-holder failed to deposit balance consideration within time and in the manner stipulated by the court, suit stood dismissed automatically; decree-holder cannot seek execution of a decree which does not exist in the eyes of law.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: P. R. Yelumalai; Respondent: N.M. Ravi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposition on Appeal From High Court Order of Remand
- Outcome
- Appeal by plaintiff dismissed; appeal by defendant allowed
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Execution of Decree, Extension of Time, Mode of Payment, Conditional Decree, Lis Pendens
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. R. Yelumalai
Appellant
N.M. Ravi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition on Appeal From High Court Order of Remand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay of one day in depositing balance sale consideration beyond stipulated period can be condoned
- 2 Whether deposit by cash instead of demand draft defeats decree compliance
- 3 Whether acceptance of deposit by court is implied extension
Ratio Decidendi
Since decree-holder failed to deposit balance consideration within time and in the manner stipulated by the court, suit stood dismissed automatically; decree-holder cannot seek execution of a decree which does not exist in the eyes of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal by plaintiff dismissed; appeal by defendant allowed
Orders
- Suit stood dismissed for non-compliance with conditional decree
- Execution petition cannot be sustained as decree does not exist
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment