P. SREEKUMAR versus STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
A second FIR filed as a counter-complaint by a different person (not the complainant in the first FIR) relating to the same incident but containing different allegations is legally maintainable and not prohibited. Such FIR should be tried on its merits; quashing on grounds of multiplicity is unwarranted where complaints provide rival versions.
- Parties
- Appellant: P. Sreekumar; Respondent: State of Kerala; Respondent: Respondent No.2 (Trustee); Respondent: Respondent No.3 (Treasurer)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Quashing FIR and Charge Sheet
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Quashing of FIR, Inherent Jurisdiction Under S.482 Cr PC, Counter Complaint, Multiple Firs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. Sreekumar
Appellant
State of Kerala
Respondent
Respondent No.2 (Trustee)
Respondent
Respondent No.3 (Treasurer)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Quashing FIR and Charge Sheet
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subsequent FIR relating to the same offence is liable to be quashed
- 2 Whether counter-complaint (FIR) by different person for same incident is maintainable
Ratio Decidendi
A second FIR filed as a counter-complaint by a different person (not the complainant in the first FIR) relating to the same incident but containing different allegations is legally maintainable and not prohibited. Such FIR should be tried on its merits; quashing on grounds of multiplicity is unwarranted where complaints provide rival versions.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order passed in Criminal M.C No. 2641/2007 is set aside
- C.C. No.2682 of 2002 on the file of the JMFC-II, Ernakulum is restored for trial on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment