P. VEERAPPA versus M.A. MOHAMMED AMANULLA

P. VEERAPPA versus M.A. MOHAMMED AMANULLA

Since the appellant failed to pay consideration within the agreed time, the agreement to sell ended and the rights asserted under it lapsed. The pre-existing tenancy relationship revived, and eviction proceedings under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, Section 21 were maintainable. The Rent Controller had jurisdiction to proceed with eviction.

Parties
Appellant: P. Veerappa; Respondent: M.A. Mohammed Amanulla
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 December 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Karnataka High Court Order in C.r.p. No. 3019 of 1987; Supreme Court Order Delivered at Final Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Eviction Proceedings, Merger of Tenancy Rights, Enforcement of Agreement to Sell, Jurisdiction of Rent Controller, Benefit Under Section 53 a Transfer of Property Act
Rent Control Property Law Eviction Proceedings Merger of Tenancy Rights Enforcement of Agreement to Sell Jurisdiction of Rent Controller Benefit Under Section 53 a Transfer of Property Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P. Veerappa

Appellant

M.A. Mohammed Amanulla

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Karnataka High Court Order in C.r.p. No. 3019 of 1987; Supreme Court Order Delivered at Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether tenant can resist eviction under Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, Section 21 on the ground of agreement to purchase and claim protection under Section 53-A of Transfer of Property Act
  2. 2 Whether tenancy rights merge in agreement-holder rights, ousting jurisdiction of Rent Controller

Ratio Decidendi

Since the appellant failed to pay consideration within the agreed time, the agreement to sell ended and the rights asserted under it lapsed. The pre-existing tenancy relationship revived, and eviction proceedings under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, Section 21 were maintainable. The Rent Controller had jurisdiction to proceed with eviction.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no costs.
  • Open to appellant to raise all defences in the Rent Control proceedings.