PADMA BEN BANUSHALI AND ANR. versus YOGENDRA RATHORE AND ORS.
Adjustment of a decree out of court will not be recognised unless it is certified by the executing court under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC. On facts, there was no certified adjustment and no conscious waiver by decree-holder; thus the decree remains executable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Padma Ben Banushali; Appellant: Kanji Bhai Banushali; Respondent: Yogendra Rathore
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Decree, Adjustment of Decrees, Waiver of Rights, Harmonious Construction of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Padma Ben Banushali
Appellant
Kanji Bhai Banushali
Appellant
Yogendra Rathore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether uncertified out-of-court adjustment renders a decree in-executable
- 2 Interpretation of Section 47 and Order XXI Rule 2 of CPC
- 3 Effect of alleged waiver under agreement on decree-holder's right to execute decree
Ratio Decidendi
Adjustment of a decree out of court will not be recognised unless it is certified by the executing court under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC. On facts, there was no certified adjustment and no conscious waiver by decree-holder; thus the decree remains executable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- High Court's order set aside
- Decree is executable
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment