PADMAVATHY AMMA versus AMMUNNI PANICKER AND ANR.

PADMAVATHY AMMA versus AMMUNNI PANICKER AND ANR.

Under the facts, the gift in question, even if construed to have been for the benefit of the sister alone, entailed that all her three children had equal interest in the property. Thus, the suit for one-sixth share by the son (respondent) was rightly decreed.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Padmavathy Amma; Respondent No. 1: Ammunni Panicker; Respondent No. 2: Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 May 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Kerala High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Marumakkathayam Law, Gift Under Marumakkathayam Law, Succession and Inheritance, Tenancy in Common, Tavazhi Property
Hindu Law Marumakkathayam Law Gift Under Marumakkathayam Law Succession and Inheritance Tenancy in Common Tavazhi Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Padmavathy Amma

Appellant

Ammunni Panicker

Respondent No. 1

Anr.

Respondent No. 2

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Kerala High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the gift by brother to his sister was for her exclusive benefit or also for the benefit of her Tavazhi under Marumakkathayam Law.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the facts, the gift in question, even if construed to have been for the benefit of the sister alone, entailed that all her three children had equal interest in the property. Thus, the suit for one-sixth share by the son (respondent) was rightly decreed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Plaintiff (respondent) entitled to one-sixth share of the suit property
  • No order as to costs