PAL SINGH versus SUNDER SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.
If the other co-owner does not object, one co-owner is entitled to maintain an eviction petition. The respondent proved his bona fide need and absence of alternative accommodation, and the suit was maintainable even without impleading all co-owners.
- Parties
- Appellant: Pal Singh; Respondent: Sunder Singh (Dead) by LRs. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment in Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Co Ownership, Bona Fide Requirement, Estoppel, Landlord and Tenant Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pal Singh
Appellant
Sunder Singh (Dead) by LRs. & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment in Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether one co-owner of property can maintain eviction petition
- 2 Whether bona fide need of landlord is established
- 3 Whether the action for eviction was maintainable without impleading other co-owners
Ratio Decidendi
If the other co-owner does not object, one co-owner is entitled to maintain an eviction petition. The respondent proved his bona fide need and absence of alternative accommodation, and the suit was maintainable even without impleading all co-owners.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Eviction petition maintained
- Respondent proved grounds for eviction and bona fide need
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment