PARAKH VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED versus BAROMA AGRO PRODUCT AND OTHERS

PARAKH VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED versus BAROMA AGRO PRODUCT AND OTHERS

Appellant cannot claim exclusive right or exclusive use of the word 'MALABAR' due to the disclaimer in registration under Class-30; labels are substantially different, no deceptive similarity; respondents are entitled to use 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' in modified form as approved by High Court.

Parties
Appellant: Parakh Vanijya Private Limited; Respondents: Baroma Agro Product and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Disclaimer in Trademark Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Parakh Vanijya Private Limited

Appellant

Baroma Agro Product and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Decision

  1. 1 Whether the appellant can claim exclusive right over the word 'MALABAR' despite the disclaimer in the trademark registration
  2. 2 Whether the respondents' use of 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' constitutes infringement or passing off

Ratio Decidendi

Appellant cannot claim exclusive right or exclusive use of the word 'MALABAR' due to the disclaimer in registration under Class-30; labels are substantially different, no deceptive similarity; respondents are entitled to use 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' in modified form as approved by High Court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Respondents entitled to use the word 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' with approved get-up.
  • All contentious issues left open to be resolved in the pending suit.