PARAKH VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED versus BAROMA AGRO PRODUCT AND OTHERS
Appellant cannot claim exclusive right or exclusive use of the word 'MALABAR' due to the disclaimer in registration under Class-30; labels are substantially different, no deceptive similarity; respondents are entitled to use 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' in modified form as approved by High Court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Parakh Vanijya Private Limited; Respondents: Baroma Agro Product and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Disclaimer in Trademark Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parakh Vanijya Private Limited
Appellant
Baroma Agro Product and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant can claim exclusive right over the word 'MALABAR' despite the disclaimer in the trademark registration
- 2 Whether the respondents' use of 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' constitutes infringement or passing off
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant cannot claim exclusive right or exclusive use of the word 'MALABAR' due to the disclaimer in registration under Class-30; labels are substantially different, no deceptive similarity; respondents are entitled to use 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' in modified form as approved by High Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Respondents entitled to use the word 'MALABAR' in conjunction with 'BAROMA' with approved get-up.
- All contentious issues left open to be resolved in the pending suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment