PARLE PRODUCTS (P) LTD. versus J. P. & CO. MYSORE
The overall similarity of the respondents' wrapper to the appellants' registered trade mark was such as to be likely to mislead an average purchaser, constituting infringement under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The concurrent findings of the lower courts were not based on a proper appreciation of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Parle Products (P) Ltd.; Respondent: J. P. & Co. Mysore
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Decree of Mysore High Court in Regular First Appeal No. 170 of 1963
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parle Products (P) Ltd.
Appellant
J. P. & Co. Mysore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Decree of Mysore High Court in Regular First Appeal No. 170 of 1963
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's wrapper is deceptively similar to the registered trade mark of the appellant under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.
Ratio Decidendi
The overall similarity of the respondents' wrapper to the appellants' registered trade mark was such as to be likely to mislead an average purchaser, constituting infringement under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. The concurrent findings of the lower courts were not based on a proper appreciation of the law regarding deceptive similarity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Decree in favour of the appellant.
- Injunction restraining the respondent from selling or using biscuits in wrappers similar in appearance to the registered trade mark of the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment