PASHORA SINGH AND ANR. versus STATE OF PUNJAB
The appellant had no intention to cause death nor knowledge of likely death; only injury No.1 was dangerous to life but not sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death, and it was not established which accused inflicted it. Therefore, conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC cannot be sustained;...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Pashora Singh; Appellant: Lahora Singh; Respondent: State of Punjab
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court (appeal by Special Leave)
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Infliction of Injuries, Sentencing, Probation, Section 307 IPC, Section 326 IPC, Section 34 IPC
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pashora Singh
Appellant
Lahora Singh
Appellant
State of Punjab
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court (appeal by Special Leave)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused committed offence under Section 307 or Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC
- 2 Appropriate sentence for convicted offences
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant had no intention to cause death nor knowledge of likely death; only injury No.1 was dangerous to life but not sufficient in the ordinary course to cause death, and it was not established which accused inflicted it. Therefore, conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC cannot be sustained; conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Conviction and sentence under Sections 307/34 IPC set aside
- Conviction under Sections 326/34 IPC substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment