UNION OF INDIA versus BIDHUBHUSHAN MALIK AND OTHERS
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Allahabad High Court, holding that the pension entitlement under the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 (as amended) cannot be restricted by the retiree’s date of retirement, and that the relevant provision is unconstitutional. Liberalised pension operates from October 1, 1984, but no arrears apply for period before that date.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Union of India; Respondents: Bidhubhushan Malik and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal at Supreme Court
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pension Entitlement of High Court Judges, Validity of Amended Pension Provision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Petitioner
Bidhubhushan Malik and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal at Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of the words 'and who has retired on or after the 1st day of October, 1984' in para 10 of First Schedule to the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 (as amended)
- 2 Entitlement of Judges (including Chief Justices) to pension irrespective of date of retirement
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Allahabad High Court, holding that the pension entitlement under the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 (as amended) cannot be restricted by the retiree’s date of retirement, and that the relevant provision is unconstitutional. Liberalised pension operates from October 1, 1984, but no arrears apply for period before that date.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Special leave petition dismissed
- Allahabad High Court judgment in W.P. No. 3281 of 1979 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment