P.G. ESHWARAPPA versus M. RUDRAPPA AND ORS.

P.G. ESHWARAPPA versus M. RUDRAPPA AND ORS.

Eviction of respondents in execution of a decree after the Land Reforms Act, 1961 came into force was in violation of Section 22(1); statutory bar on eviction overrides court decree and principles of estoppel or res judicata.

Parties
Appellant: P.G. Eshwarappa; Respondents: M. Rudrappa and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 August 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave Following Division Bench Judgment of Karnataka High Court in W.p. No. 4044 of 1986
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Land Reforms Act, Tenancy, Eviction, Estoppel, Res Judicata
Land Law Land Reforms Act Tenancy Eviction Estoppel Res Judicata

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P.G. Eshwarappa

Appellant

M. Rudrappa and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave Following Division Bench Judgment of Karnataka High Court in W.p. No. 4044 of 1986

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether eviction executed after coming into force of the Land Reforms Act, 1961 violates Section 22(1)
  2. 2 Applicability of principles of estoppel and res judicata where statutory prohibition exists

Ratio Decidendi

Eviction of respondents in execution of a decree after the Land Reforms Act, 1961 came into force was in violation of Section 22(1); statutory bar on eviction overrides court decree and principles of estoppel or res judicata.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed without costs
  • Respondents entitled to possession and continue in possession