PHOOL PATTI AND ANR versus RAM SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ANR.
There is inconsistency between the Supreme Court's interpretation in K. Raghunandan's and Bhoop Singh's cases regarding exception in clause (vi) of Section 17(2) Registration Act, 1908; the matter requires consideration by a larger Bench.
- Parties
- Appellant: Phool Patti; Respondent: Ram Singh (dead) through LRs.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Reference to Larger Bench
- Outcome
- Reference to Larger Bench
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Documents, Consent Decree, Collusive Decree, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phool Patti
Appellant
Ram Singh (dead) through LRs.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Reference to Larger Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent decree dated 24.11.1980 was collusive and liable to be set aside
- 2 Interpretation of exception in clause (vi) of Section 17(2) of the Registration Act, 1908 regarding registration requirements
Ratio Decidendi
There is inconsistency between the Supreme Court's interpretation in K. Raghunandan's and Bhoop Singh's cases regarding exception in clause (vi) of Section 17(2) Registration Act, 1908; the matter requires consideration by a larger Bench.
Court Disposition
Reference to Larger Bench
Orders
- Matter referred to Hon'ble Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger Bench to interpret exception in clause (vi) of Section 17(2) of Registration Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment