P.K. MOHAN RAM versus B.N. ANANTHACHARY AND ORS.
Ex.A-2, when read as a whole, is a Settlement Deed creating a vested right in favour of 16 beneficiaries in praesenti, despite some rights being exercisable only after the settlor's death; its terms prohibit the settlor from cancelling or altering it, and the High Court erred in treating it as a Will.
- Parties
- Appellant: P.K. Mohan Ram; Respondents: B.N. Ananthachary and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Deeds and Documents, Distinction Between Settlement Deed and Will, Vested and Contingent Interest, Transfer of Property Act Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.K. Mohan Ram
Appellant
B.N. Ananthachary and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether document Ex.A-2 executed by the original owner was a Settlement Deed or a Will
- 2 Whether the beneficiary's rights in the suit property vested in praesenti or were contingent
- 3 Whether the original owner had the right to execute a Revocation Deed or Will after executing Settlement Deed Ex.A-2
Ratio Decidendi
Ex.A-2, when read as a whole, is a Settlement Deed creating a vested right in favour of 16 beneficiaries in praesenti, despite some rights being exercisable only after the settlor's death; its terms prohibit the settlor from cancelling or altering it, and the High Court erred in treating it as a Will.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned High Court judgment set aside
- Judgments and decrees of the trial Court and lower appellate Court restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment