M/S PRIME PROPERTIES versus SANA LAKSHMI DEVI (DIED) THROUGH HER LRS. & ORS.
The High Court's order setting aside the Trial Court's review order was set aside; the rejoinder already filed is to remain on record, but defendant Nos.4 to 11 are permitted to file sur-rejoinder only to the extent of any new facts newly pleaded in the plaintiff's rejoinder; no further issues to be framed; the trial must be assigned specific priority and conducted expeditiously, preferably concluded before 31.03.2023.
- Parties
- Plaintiff Appellant: M/S Prime Properties; Respondents: Sana Lakshmi Devi (Died) through her LRs. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (civil Appeal No. 7181 of 2022) Against High Court Order in CRP No. 204 of 2022 / Appeal to the Supreme Court From High Court Order; Leave Granted; Appeal Disposed of by Judgment of Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; impugned High Court order dated 14.03.2022 set aside; Trial Court order dated 29.12.2021 made applicable with modification
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Rejoinder, Sur Rejoinder, Review Petitions, Trial Management, Impleadment, Limitation on Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S Prime Properties
Plaintiff Appellant
Sana Lakshmi Devi (Died) through her LRs. & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (civil Appeal No. 7181 of 2022) Against High Court Order in CRP No. 204 of 2022 / Appeal to the Supreme Court From High Court Order; Leave Granted; Appeal Disposed of by Judgment of Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trial Court rightly reviewed its order and took the plaintiff's rejoinder on record
- 2 Whether the High Court rightly set aside the Trial Court's review order
- 3 Scope and limits of review under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and Section 114 CPC
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court's order setting aside the Trial Court's review order was set aside; the rejoinder already filed is to remain on record, but defendant Nos.4 to 11 are permitted to file sur-rejoinder only to the extent of any new facts newly pleaded in the plaintiff's rejoinder; no further issues to be framed; the trial must be assigned specific priority and conducted expeditiously, preferably concluded before 31.03.2023.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; impugned High Court order dated 14.03.2022 set aside; Trial Court order dated 29.12.2021 made applicable with modification
Orders
- Impugned order dated 14.03.2022 set aside
- Order of Trial Court dated 29.12.2021 to apply with modification
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment