PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMA versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.
The 'Lohar' community in Bihar is not included as a Scheduled Tribe in the authoritative English text of the Scheduled Tribes Order, and cannot claim Scheduled Tribe status; only Parliament can amend the Schedules.
- Parties
- Appellant: Prabhat Kumar Sharma; Respondents: Union Public Service Commission and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal and Writ Petitions / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- appeal and writ petitions dismissed with costs throughout
- Legal Topics
- Scheduled Tribes Status, Authoritative Text of Statutes, Judicial Power to Declare Caste/tribe, Reservation Eligibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prabhat Kumar Sharma
Appellant
Union Public Service Commission and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal and Writ Petitions / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'Lohar' community in Bihar is a Scheduled Tribe or Other Backward Class
- 2 Whether Hindi or English version of Scheduled Tribes Order is authoritative
- 3 Jurisdiction of courts to include or exclude castes/tribes from Schedules
Ratio Decidendi
The 'Lohar' community in Bihar is not included as a Scheduled Tribe in the authoritative English text of the Scheduled Tribes Order, and cannot claim Scheduled Tribe status; only Parliament can amend the Schedules.
Court Disposition
appeal and writ petitions dismissed with costs throughout
Orders
- No merit found; appeal and writ petitions dismissed with costs.
- No further reference of Nityanand Sharma case to larger bench.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment