PRAKASH CHANDRA versus NARAYAN
Hardship defence under Section 20(2)(b) of the Specific Relief Act must be pleaded and supported by evidence. In this case, since the respondent did not plead nor bring evidence of hardship, the trial court's decree for specific performance stands. The first appellate court and High Court erred in setting aside the decree without such an issue or evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Prakash Chandra; Respondent: Narayan
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal/decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decree for specific performance affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance of Contract, Hardship Defense Under Specific Relief Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prakash Chandra
Appellant
Narayan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of specific performance would cause hardship to the respondent under Section 20(2)(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
- 2 Whether the appellate court and High Court erred in reversing the trial court's decree for specific performance without an issue framed or evidence regarding hardship.
Ratio Decidendi
Hardship defence under Section 20(2)(b) of the Specific Relief Act must be pleaded and supported by evidence. In this case, since the respondent did not plead nor bring evidence of hardship, the trial court's decree for specific performance stands. The first appellate court and High Court erred in setting aside the decree without such an issue or evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decree for specific performance affirmed.
Orders
- Order passed by the High Court and the first appellate court set aside.
- Judgment and decree of the trial court affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment