PRAKASH H. JAIN versus M/S. MARIE FERNANDES

PRAKASH H. JAIN versus M/S. MARIE FERNANDES

The Competent Authority under Chapter VIII of Maharashtra Rent Control Act is not a 'court', possesses only powers strictly conferred by statute, and cannot condone delay in filing application for leave to contest eviction under Section 43(4)(a); Limitation Act, 1963 has no application.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Prakash H. Jain; Respondent: Ms. Marie Fernandes
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
23 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Eviction Proceedings, Condonation of Delay, Limitation Act Applicability
Rent Control Property Law Eviction Proceedings Condonation of Delay Limitation Act Applicability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prakash H. Jain

Appellant

Ms. Marie Fernandes

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Competent Authority under Chapter VIII of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 is a 'court' for the purpose of the Limitation Act, 1963.
  2. 2 Whether the Competent Authority has inherent power to condone delay in filing application for leave to contest eviction/defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Competent Authority under Chapter VIII of Maharashtra Rent Control Act is not a 'court', possesses only powers strictly conferred by statute, and cannot condone delay in filing application for leave to contest eviction under Section 43(4)(a); Limitation Act, 1963 has no application.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs
  • Competent Authority to pass further orders on respondent's application for eviction in accordance with law.