PRAMOD KUMAR MANTRI AND ANR. versus STATE OF ORISSA

PRAMOD KUMAR MANTRI AND ANR. versus STATE OF ORISSA

Prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants shared the common intention with A-1 to kill the deceased and that they committed an offence under S. 304 Part II IPC due to lack of corroborating evidence and reliability issues in witness testimony.

Parties
Appellant: Pramod Kumar Mantri; Appellant: Bhagirathi Rout; Respondent: State of Orissa
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 January 1997
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside for appellants 2 and 3 under Section 304, Part II IPC.
Legal Topics
Murder, Common Intention, Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Evidence Assessment
Criminal Law Murder Common Intention Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Evidence Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pramod Kumar Mantri

Appellant

Bhagirathi Rout

Appellant

State of Orissa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants shared the common intention to kill the deceased under S. 302 r/w 34 IPC
  2. 2 Whether the evidence establishes the offence under S. 304 Part II IPC

Ratio Decidendi

Prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants shared the common intention with A-1 to kill the deceased and that they committed an offence under S. 304 Part II IPC due to lack of corroborating evidence and reliability issues in witness testimony.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside for appellants 2 and 3 under Section 304, Part II IPC.

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence under Section 304 Part II IPC for appellants 2 and 3 set aside.