PRATAP MEHTA versus SUNIL GUPTA & ORS.
Both elections held on 29.06.2014 and 02.08.2014 were invalid because proper notice and agenda as required by rule 7 of Bar Council of India Rules were not issued; High Court was correct in ordering a fresh election and giving effect to the fresh election conducted on 12.08.2018.
- Parties
- Appellant: Pratap Mehta; Respondent: Sunil Gupta; Appellant: State Bar Council of M.P.; Respondent: Bar Council of India
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Letters Patent Appeals
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bar Council Elections, Validity of Elections, Writ Jurisdiction, Notice and Agenda Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pratap Mehta
Appellant
Sunil Gupta
Respondent
State Bar Council of M.P.
Appellant
Bar Council of India
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Letters Patent Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the elections held on 29.06.2014 and 02.08.2014 for representative to Bar Council of India from State Bar Council were valid
- 2 Whether proper notice and agenda were issued as per Bar Council of India Rules
- 3 Scope of writ jurisdiction regarding findings of fact
Ratio Decidendi
Both elections held on 29.06.2014 and 02.08.2014 were invalid because proper notice and agenda as required by rule 7 of Bar Council of India Rules were not issued; High Court was correct in ordering a fresh election and giving effect to the fresh election conducted on 12.08.2018.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Election already conducted on 12.08.2018 be given effect to by all concerned.
- Parties to bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment