PREMA versus NANJE GOWDA AND OTHERS
When a statutory amendment conferring enhanced rights is enforced and final decree proceedings are pending, the party benefiting from the amendment (here, unmarried daughter) may seek such enlarged share in final decree proceedings, and the court is duty bound to give effect to the change, even if preliminary decree was earlier affirmed and appeals dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Prema; Respondents: Nanje Gowda and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Order in Civil Revision Petition No. 3079 of 2000 From High Court of Karnataka Arising From Amendment Application in Final Decree Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders of High Court and trial court set aside; application under Sections 151, 152, and 153 CPC by appellant allowed in terms of relief sought.
- Legal Topics
- Partition of Joint Family Property, Preliminary and Final Decrees, Amendments to Statutory Succession Rights, Benefit of State Amendments in Final Decree Proceedings, Equal Rights of Unmarried Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prema
Appellant
Nanje Gowda and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Order in Civil Revision Petition No. 3079 of 2000 From High Court of Karnataka Arising From Amendment Application in Final Decree Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unmarried daughter can seek enhanced share in joint family property in final decree proceedings after Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990 (Karnataka Act No.23 of 1994) inserting section 6A was enforced
- 2 Whether preliminary decree in partition suit can be modified in light of statutory amendments before passing final decree
Ratio Decidendi
When a statutory amendment conferring enhanced rights is enforced and final decree proceedings are pending, the party benefiting from the amendment (here, unmarried daughter) may seek such enlarged share in final decree proceedings, and the court is duty bound to give effect to the change, even if preliminary decree was earlier affirmed and appeals dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders of High Court and trial court set aside; application under Sections 151, 152, and 153 CPC by appellant allowed in terms of relief sought.
Orders
- If final decree is not yet passed, trial court directed to pass it within six months from receipt of Supreme Court judgment.
- If final decree already passed, trial court directed to amend it in terms of Supreme Court judgment and give effect to appellant’s right under section 6A of Karnataka Act No.23 of 1994.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment