SAMEER KAPOOR AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE THROUGH SUB-DIVISION MAGISTRATE SOUTH, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to applications under Sections 276 and 228 of the Indian Succession Act; however the three-year limitation runs from the date the 'right to apply' accrues, which is when it becomes necessary to apply (a continuous right), and on the facts pleaded (intermeddling with bequeathed properties after death in 2000) respondent No.2's Probate Case No.15/2001 was not barred by limitation; the High Court correctly refused to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
- Parties
- Appellants: Sameer Kapoor and Another; Respondents: The State through Sub-Division Magistrate South, New Delhi and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal No. 10482 of 2013 / On Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 16.01.2009
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Probate, Letters of Administration, Article 137 Limitation Act, 1963, Section 228 Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 276 Indian Succession Act, Order VII Rule 11 CPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sameer Kapoor and Another
Appellants
The State through Sub-Division Magistrate South, New Delhi and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 10482 of 2013 / On Appeal From High Court Judgment Dated 16.01.2009
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to applications for grant of probate or letters of administration
- 2 Whether an application under Section 228 of the Indian Succession Act is barred by the period of limitation prescribed under Article 137 and when the 'right to apply' accrues
Ratio Decidendi
Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to applications under Sections 276 and 228 of the Indian Succession Act; however the three-year limitation runs from the date the 'right to apply' accrues, which is when it becomes necessary to apply (a continuous right), and on the facts pleaded (intermeddling with bequeathed properties after death in 2000) respondent No.2's Probate Case No.15/2001 was not barred by limitation; the High Court correctly refused to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment