PROF. S.A. SIDDIQUI versus PROF. M. WAJID KHAN AND ORS.
Professors appointed under Merit Promotion Scheme and general scheme are part of the same cadre. Seniority is determined by length of continuous service in grade. The appellant, promoted as professor under Merit Promotion Scheme earlier, is senior to the respondent and entitled to all consequential benefits.
- Parties
- Appellant: Prof. S.A. Siddiqui; Respondent No. 1: Prof. M. Wajid Khan; Respondents: Respondents Nos. 2-4; Respondent: Respondent No. 5 (UGC)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 4.4.97 of the Allahabad High Court in C.m.w. No. 5821 of 1996
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; impugned judgment and order of Allahabad High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Seniority of Professors, Merit Promotion Scheme, Cadre Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prof. S.A. Siddiqui
Appellant
Prof. M. Wajid Khan
Respondent No. 1
Respondents Nos. 2-4
Respondents
Respondent No. 5 (UGC)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 4.4.97 of the Allahabad High Court in C.m.w. No. 5821 of 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Inter-se seniority between professors appointed under Merit Promotion Scheme and general scheme
- 2 Whether merit promotees are outside the cadre of professors
- 3 Applicability of Aligarh Muslim University Act and Statutes to seniority determination
Ratio Decidendi
Professors appointed under Merit Promotion Scheme and general scheme are part of the same cadre. Seniority is determined by length of continuous service in grade. The appellant, promoted as professor under Merit Promotion Scheme earlier, is senior to the respondent and entitled to all consequential benefits.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; impugned judgment and order of Allahabad High Court set aside.
Orders
- Appellant entitled to seniority above respondent No. 1 and all consequential benefits.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment