PURUSHOTTAM versus STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

PURUSHOTTAM versus STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

A site reserved for a specific civic amenity (bank) cannot be allotted for another civic amenity (petrol pump) without amending the development plan; Section 38A(1) and (2) of the BDA Act preclude such diversion, and any contrary disposition is null and void. Rule 3 of the BDA Allotment Rules, 1989 cannot override...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Purushottam; Respondent: State of Karnataka; Respondent: Bangalore Development Authority; Respondent: Bharat Petroleum Corporation; Respondent: Respondent Nos. 4-14 (writ petitioners in the High Court)
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment by Supreme Court on Appeal From Karnataka High Court
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Civic Amenity Reservation, Statutory Interpretation, Land Allotment, Development Authority Powers
Land Use Planning Administrative Law Civic Amenity Reservation Statutory Interpretation Land Allotment Development Authority Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Purushottam

Appellant

State of Karnataka

Respondent

Bangalore Development Authority

Respondent

Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Respondent

Respondent Nos. 4-14 (writ petitioners in the High Court)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment by Supreme Court on Appeal From Karnataka High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a civic amenity site earmarked for a specific purpose (bank) can be allotted for another civic amenity (petrol pump) under s.38A of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976
  2. 2 Whether such change of user requires amendment in the development plan
  3. 3 Scope of Rule 3 of the Bangalore Development Authority (Civic Amenity Site) Allotment Rules, 1989 vis-à-vis Section 38A

Ratio Decidendi

A site reserved for a specific civic amenity (bank) cannot be allotted for another civic amenity (petrol pump) without amending the development plan; Section 38A(1) and (2) of the BDA Act preclude such diversion, and any contrary disposition is null and void. Rule 3 of the BDA Allotment Rules, 1989 cannot override the statutory provision.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • The allotment of civic amenity site no. 2 to Bharat Petroleum Corporation for petrol pump is declared null and void.
  • Impugned judgment of the Karnataka High Court is affirmed.