PUTTAMMA & ORS. versus K. L. NARAYANA REDDY & ANR.
The split multiplier method is not envisaged by the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and should not be applied routinely; the multiplier must be as per Sarla Verma principle—13 for deceased aged 48 years. Deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th with four dependents. Compensation should take into account future increase in salary, and the current Second Schedule is outdated; Central Government is directed to amend it. Claimants entitled to total compensation of Rs. 23,43,688 and interest at 12% per annum from date of complaint.
- Parties
- Appellant: Puttamma & Ors.; Respondent: K. L. Narayana Reddy & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; enhanced compensation ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Multiplier Method, Split Multiplier, Interest on Compensation, Second Schedule Amendments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Puttamma & Ors.
Appellant
K. L. Narayana Reddy & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether split multiplier method should be applied for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
- 2 Whether deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses is appropriate where there are four dependents
- 3 Whether Second Schedule and its multiplier are binding for claims under Section 166
Ratio Decidendi
The split multiplier method is not envisaged by the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and should not be applied routinely; the multiplier must be as per Sarla Verma principle—13 for deceased aged 48 years. Deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th with four dependents. Compensation should take into account future increase in salary, and the current Second Schedule is outdated; Central Government is directed to amend it. Claimants entitled to total compensation of Rs. 23,43,688 and interest at 12% per annum from date of complaint.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; enhanced compensation ordered.
Orders
- Claimants entitled to Rs. 23,43,688.
- Interest at 12% per annum on enhanced compensation from the date of complaint.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment