PUTTASWAMY versus STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER
While the offence under Section 304A IPC is not compoundable, given the compromise between the parties and invoking powers under Article 142, the Court can serve the interests of justice by increasing fine and reducing sentence to period already undergone, instead of imprisonment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Puttaswamy; Respondents: State of Karnataka & Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC maintained; sentence reduced to time already undergone, subject to increased fine.
- Legal Topics
- Compounding of Offences, Powers Under Article 142, Sentencing, Section 304 a IPC, Compromise Between Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Puttaswamy
Appellant
State of Karnataka & Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an offence under Section 304A IPC, which is not compoundable under Section 320 CrPC, can be subject to compounding or any alternate relief in view of compromise between parties.
Ratio Decidendi
While the offence under Section 304A IPC is not compoundable, given the compromise between the parties and invoking powers under Article 142, the Court can serve the interests of justice by increasing fine and reducing sentence to period already undergone, instead of imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC maintained; sentence reduced to time already undergone, subject to increased fine.
Orders
- Fine enhanced from Rs.2,000 to Rs.20,000 to be paid by appellant to parents of the deceased.
- Appellant to be released forthwith upon payment of fine; if not paid within three weeks, order in abeyance for four weeks; failing further, appeal to stand dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment