R. GANDHI versus U.0.I. AND ANR.
The Office Memorandum dated 22.8.1990, which reckons the period of 15 years for restoration of commuted pension from the date of commutation, is not contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Common Cause v. Union of India. The decision in Common Cause has been rightly understood in all subsequent judgments as meaning 15 years from the date of commutation, not retirement.
- Parties
- Appellant: R. Gandhi; Respondents: Union of India and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madras High Court Judgment in Writ Petition No. 12381 of 1996
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Pensions, Commutation of Pension, Restoration of Pension, Judgment Interpretation, Retirement Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R. Gandhi
Appellant
Union of India and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madras High Court Judgment in Writ Petition No. 12381 of 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Office Memorandum dated 22.8.1990, changing the reckoning of 15 years for restoration of commuted pension from 'the date of retirement' to 'the date of commutation of pension', is contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Common Cause v. Union of India.
Ratio Decidendi
The Office Memorandum dated 22.8.1990, which reckons the period of 15 years for restoration of commuted pension from the date of commutation, is not contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Common Cause v. Union of India. The decision in Common Cause has been rightly understood in all subsequent judgments as meaning 15 years from the date of commutation, not retirement.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court judgment upheld
- No costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment