R & M TRUST versus KORAMANGALA RESIDENTS VIGILANCE GROUP AND ORS.
Once absolute title is transferred by registered sale deed, restrictions in lease-cum-sale agreement against multi-storeyed construction cease; statutes and municipal laws impose no restrictions on multi-storeyed construction; delay in filing writ petition is fatal, especially where third-party interests have arisen; Public Interest Litigation jurisdiction must be invoked sparingly and not for private or publicity motives.
- Parties
- Appellant: R & M Trust; Respondent: Koramangala Residents Vigilance Group; Respondent: Corporation of the City of Bangalore; Respondent: Deputy Director of Town Planning Corporation of the City of Bangalore
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Karnataka High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; Division Bench judgment of High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Building Permissions, Delay/laches, Public Interest Litigation, Property Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R & M Trust
Appellant
Koramangala Residents Vigilance Group
Respondent
Corporation of the City of Bangalore
Respondent
Deputy Director of Town Planning Corporation of the City of Bangalore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of Karnataka High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether granting permission for construction of multi-storeyed buildings violated municipal laws or lease conditions
- 2 Whether delay/laches bar the writ petition
- 3 Scope of Public Interest Litigation under Article 226
Ratio Decidendi
Once absolute title is transferred by registered sale deed, restrictions in lease-cum-sale agreement against multi-storeyed construction cease; statutes and municipal laws impose no restrictions on multi-storeyed construction; delay in filing writ petition is fatal, especially where third-party interests have arisen; Public Interest Litigation jurisdiction must be invoked sparingly and not for private or publicity motives.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; Division Bench judgment of High Court set aside.
Orders
- Appeal No. 1416 of 1999 allowed;
- Appeal No. 1415 of 1999 allowed;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment