R. R. ENGINEERING CO. versus ZILA PARISHAD, BAREILLY & ANR.

R. R. ENGINEERING CO. versus ZILA PARISHAD, BAREILLY & ANR.

The 'Circumstances and Property Tax' is a composite tax referable to Entries 49, 60, and 58 of List II, and falls within the legislative competence of the State Legislature; limitation under Article 276(2) applies only to taxes specifically on professions, trades, callings, or employments, and Article 277 is not applicable. Thus, the tax is valid.

Parties
Appellant: R. R. Engineering Co.; Respondent: Zila Parishad, Bareilly & Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
10 March 1980
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment by Supreme Court
Outcome
Appeals dismissed. Validity of the tax upheld.
Legal Topics
Legislative Competence, Nature of Composite Tax, Local Government Taxation, Circumstances and Property Tax

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R. R. Engineering Co.

Appellant

Zila Parishad, Bareilly & Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment by Supreme Court

  1. 1 Whether 'Circumstances and Property Tax' is a tax on income, profession, trades, callings, or employments
  2. 2 Whether State Legislature is competent to impose such a tax
  3. 3 Whether limitation under Article 276(2) applies

Ratio Decidendi

The 'Circumstances and Property Tax' is a composite tax referable to Entries 49, 60, and 58 of List II, and falls within the legislative competence of the State Legislature; limitation under Article 276(2) applies only to taxes specifically on professions, trades, callings, or employments, and Article 277 is not applicable. Thus, the tax is valid.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed. Validity of the tax upheld.

Orders

  • Validity of 'Circumstances and Property Tax' upheld.
  • Appeals dismissed with costs.