R. SAI BHARATHI versus J. JAYALALITHA AND ORS.

R. SAI BHARATHI versus J. JAYALALITHA AND ORS.

The Supreme Court held that the property was not undersold, as the sale was conducted by open tender, the bid was the highest, and above market value as determined by government officials. The tender process was not shown to be vitiated. Offences under Penal Code Sections 120-B, 409, and 169, and under Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act were not established, as there was no evidence of conspiracy, entrustment, corrupt means, or legal prohibition for purchase. The Code of Conduct lacks statutory force and is not criminally enforceable. Ethical concerns remain but provide no legal grounds for conviction.

Parties
Appellant: R. S. Bharathi; Respondent: J. Jayalalitha; Respondent: Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation Ltd. (TANSI); Respondent: A-2; Respondent: A-3 Chairman-cum-Managing Director of TANSI; Respondent: A-5 Special Deputy Collector (Stamps)
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
24 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal & Special Leave Petition / Supreme Court Final Appeal and SLP Disposition
Outcome
appeal dismissed, acquittal upheld
Legal Topics
Penal Code Offences, Prevention of Corruption Act Offences, Code of Conduct for Ministers, Government Company Property Sale
Criminal Law Corruption/anti Corruption Public Administration Penal Code Offences Prevention of Corruption Act Offences Code of Conduct for Ministers Government Company Property Sale

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R. S. Bharathi

Appellant

J. Jayalalitha

Respondent

Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation Ltd. (TANSI)

Respondent

A-2

Respondent

A-3 Chairman-cum-Managing Director of TANSI

Respondent

A-5 Special Deputy Collector (Stamps)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal & Special Leave Petition / Supreme Court Final Appeal and SLP Disposition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sale of government property to firm of Chief Minister violates penal and corruption law
  2. 2 Whether purchase by Minister is prohibited under statute or enforceable Code of Conduct
  3. 3 Whether criminal breach of trust or conspiracy is established

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the property was not undersold, as the sale was conducted by open tender, the bid was the highest, and above market value as determined by government officials. The tender process was not shown to be vitiated. Offences under Penal Code Sections 120-B, 409, and 169, and under Sections 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act were not established, as there was no evidence of conspiracy, entrustment, corrupt means, or legal prohibition for purchase. The Code of Conduct lacks statutory force and is not criminally enforceable. Ethical concerns remain but provide no legal grounds for conviction.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed, acquittal upheld

Orders

  • Accused directed to return property unconditionally in keeping with good ethical behaviour