R. S. SIAL versus THE STATE OF U.P. & ORS
The order of reversion did not cast any stigma or aspersion and reverted the appellant to his substantive post. The reversion was motivated by pending inquiry but was not the foundation of punishment; thus Article 311(2) was not attracted and requirements thereof did not need to be complied with.
- Parties
- Appellant: R. S. Sial; Respondents: State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order Dated 12th January, 1971 of the Allahabad High Court (lucknow Bench) in Writ Petition No. 1073 of 1968
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 311(2) Reversion From an Officiating Post, Punishment Requirements Under Article 311, Principles of Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R. S. Sial
Appellant
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order Dated 12th January, 1971 of the Allahabad High Court (lucknow Bench) in Writ Petition No. 1073 of 1968
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reversion from an officiating higher post to substantive post attracts Article 311(2)
- 2 Whether the order of reversion amounted to punishment requiring compliance with Article 311
Ratio Decidendi
The order of reversion did not cast any stigma or aspersion and reverted the appellant to his substantive post. The reversion was motivated by pending inquiry but was not the foundation of punishment; thus Article 311(2) was not attracted and requirements thereof did not need to be complied with.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.
- Application for taking on record additional documents in appeal is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment