RAVI CONSTRUCTIONS CO. versus SOMVANSHI ARYA KSHATRIYA SAMAJ AND ORS.
Suit was not maintainable as the chief trustee filed the earlier suit and entered into the compromise authorized by resolution signed by all trustees, with their knowledge and consent; second appeal allowed by High Court without framing question of law was contrary to Section 100 CPC.
- Parties
- Appellant: RA VI CONSTRUCTIONS CO.; Respondent: SOMVANSHI ARYA KSHATRIYA SAMAJ; Chief Trustee/respondent No.2: Nilkanth Mahadeo Kamble
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal No. 729 of 2004 / Appeal From Bombay High Court Second Appeal No. 289 of 1994
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Consent Decree, Maintainability of Suit, Compromise by Trustee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RA VI CONSTRUCTIONS CO.
Appellant
SOMVANSHI ARYA KSHATRIYA SAMAJ
Respondent
Nilkanth Mahadeo Kamble
Chief Trustee/respondent No.2
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 729 of 2004 / Appeal From Bombay High Court Second Appeal No. 289 of 1994
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit challenging consent decree passed in earlier suit filed by chief trustee was maintainable without joining other trustees as plaintiffs and whether the chief trustee had authority to compromise.
Ratio Decidendi
Suit was not maintainable as the chief trustee filed the earlier suit and entered into the compromise authorized by resolution signed by all trustees, with their knowledge and consent; second appeal allowed by High Court without framing question of law was contrary to Section 100 CPC.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- High Court judgment set aside
- Appellant to pay Rs.3,00,000/- to respondent No.1 trust within three months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment